Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] It's very frustrating to have to > repeat the same points over and over again, because some people don't > apparently read them before replying.
Amen. > I can appreciate of course, that Debian legal folk, having discussed > this already, and having amongst themselves already reached a consensus, > find it difficult to have to revisit the same question. [...] Please check the prejudice in at the door. > On the other hand, some of the responses on this list have been very > rude, which does make it difficult to have an intelligent conversation. > I don't find that hurling insults or airing conspiracy theories is > particularly helpful. FWIW, I don't find the finger-jabbing, confrontational style of this: > However, in respect for your request, I've eliminated all stylistic > emphasis from this post. IMHO, this makes it harder to read, but I > trust you are prepared to make the extra effort. [...] this: > (Once again, here's the binary/source to TPM/non-TPM analogy that MJ Ray > insists isn't being used to support parallel distribution... being used > to support parallel distribution!) [...] and this: > Okay, but what part did you not understand? [...] at all helpful. What responses were rude? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]