On 01/12/07 09:27, Francesco Poli wrote: >> Even though the existence of an optional clause (like NC) appears to >> contradict the DFSG in situations we can imagine, that does not rule >> out it's use will always contradict the DFSG for every case. > > I think it will: it forbids selling the work (fails DFSG#1) and > discriminates against a field of endeavor (fails DFSG#6).
I agree with what you say here. My argument is based on the fact that those rules are _guidelines_ and sometimes there are exceptions. Maybe we disagree that there can ever be valid exceptions? >> I hope the above is a bit clearer? > > Only a bit, not much, unfortunately... :( I'm optimistic we'll reach a better understanding. Then again I tend to be optimistic about a lot of stuff. :) Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
