On 3/5/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:23:40AM -0800, Sean Kellogg wrote: > > So, from the lawyer's perspective, it is a matter of client-attorney > privilege. SPI now has to make the decision that full disclosure to the > public via d-l is worth the potential risk of losing that protection. My > guess would be the lawyer has done the research on how one could bring suit > against Debian/SPI/3rd party and disclosure would be like handing a roadmap > to "the enemy." You generally want to make the cost of bringing suit against > you as high as possible to warred off long-shot litigation. > OK. Makes perfect sense to me.
And me. Ta muchly for the explanation. Cheers, -- Andrew Saunders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
