On Thursday 07 June 2007 23:51, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:17:28PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote: > > GnuTLS + libgcrypt + libtasn1 implements everything unless you need > > ECC. > > > > > And why does FSFE disagree with our interpretation? > > > > Michael Poole gave a good answer. > > He didn't address the FSFE -- where are they taking a different analysis > than us on this? > > Kern, is it possible to remove the OpenSSL exception from the license of only > those third-party sources, and keep it in the master license?
The problem is that those third-party sources are linked into the Bacula binaries, and since they are licensed as GPL with no modifications, I cannot include them in a binary that has code that is licensed in a way that is incompatible with the GPL. Adding the OpenSSL exception to my license makes my code incompatible with the non-modified GPL, and hence I was violating the license on those 3rd party files (copyrighted by FSF, ATT, Sun, and a few others ...). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
