Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 00:36 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le jeudi 28 juin 2007 à 10:24 +0200, Bruno Costacurta a écrit : > > > AFAICS you can use it legally if you port it to GNUTLS. > > > - the actual code implemented a strong separation layer between OpenSSL and > > Qt > > (review of code can be made by independent party) thus licenses should not > > be > > mixed in their interpretations. > > Regardless of the implementation, a resulting binary that requires both > OpenSSL and Qt to work is considered a derived work from both, and is > therefore not distributable.
Hmm, I forgot what I said earlier about the QPL when writing this. A work that links with both OpenSSL and Qt *is* distributable, but in this case section #6 of the QPL applies. I think this is not OK for main, but it is acceptable for non-free. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
