Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > It is my opinion that the MPL license fails to meet the DFSG. > > This opinion seems to be shared by other debian-legal regulars: > > The MPL is an accepted license for main. I'm sorry your opinion differs, > and that the views of other non-DDs and non-maintainers on the matter > have gone uncorrected and left the misleading impression that there's > any question as to whether the MPL is suitable for main.
So where is the source for old versions stored? The alioth CVS is not publicly available. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
