On 9/6/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can logos be considered "reasonable legal notices" or "author > attributions"? > What do you think?
A logo definitely isn't a legal notice, but it *could* be an author attribution (although to me it seems more a project attribution or even an advertisement.) If it is considered an author attribution, it's still only reasonable where the code is used as originally intended in a graphical environment. If the code were somehow adapted for non-graphical use there'd be issues. -- Andrew Donnellan <>< ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure) http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58 http://linux.org.au http://debian.org Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] === -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]