On 9/6/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can logos be considered "reasonable legal notices" or "author
> attributions"?
> What do you think?
A logo definitely isn't a legal notice, but it *could* be an author
attribution (although to me it seems more a project attribution or
even an advertisement.) If it is considered an author attribution,
it's still only reasonable where the code is used as originally
intended in a graphical environment. If the code were somehow adapted
for non-graphical use there'd be issues.
--
Andrew Donnellan <><
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
