John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My gut feeling is this is OK, but I don't know what the general > approach is to relying on such statements. Does anyone know of any > other Debian packages that include such vague licensing terms?
There's a couple of things which claim to be in the public domain but include copyright-covered work from places which don't have such a simple way to put things into the public domain AFAIK. One example is chat, in the ppp package. I think we usually take our best guess and accept them, which seems a good idea to me. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
