Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 12:35 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit : > > > > The GPL explicitely allows to use code under other licenses from GPL > > > > code. > > > > > > No, it does not. If you think it does, please point the line where it > > > "explicitly" allows it. > > > > Well, _I_ did already explain why this is the case. You did not give any > > evidence for your claim. > > > > GPL §2b) verifies that the GPL is asymmetric. > > The fact that you don't understand what "derived work" means is > irrelevant to this discussion.
If you continue to missunderstand the term "derived work", you don't seem to be a suited discussion partner. > > http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf > > verifies that GPL §2b) is asymmetric. > > After reading such basic, giant misunderstandings like: > The GPL does not prohibit licensees from charging money for > selling software copies. However, the GPL itself already > provides everyone with a license free of charge. As a result, > licensees have no realistic chances to commercialize their > copyrights in works that they ???derive??? from GPLed code. > I will not read any further this document, sorry. You will have to back > up your claims with people who know what they are talking about. If you have such basic missunderstandings, you should first start with some basic GPL reading... Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
