Argh!

Are you right. I had a feeling that I had read that before, but tonight I
was in the mood that this was imposing a clause that might cause a license
problem, and as it was not stating in any other place that it is a BSD
license, I didn't realized.

Thanks

On Jan 23, 2008 11:34 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Le mercredi 23 janvier 2008 à 23:25 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a
> écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am concerned about the following license snippet, basically point 3
> > which talk about use of authors' name.
> > This comes from a source included in conduit (version 0.3.6, not yet
> > uploaded)
>
> > 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
> >    derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
>
> This is the standard 3rd clause of the BSD license, and there are
> probably hundreds of packages with such a clause in the archive.
>
> --
>  .''`.
> : :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
> `. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
>  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.
>



-- 
José Carlos García Sogo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to