On Jan 24, 2008 12:23 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's still unfortunate to have confusing and unclear language in the > > licence, but it's not non-free. > > I'll reserve judgement until we can know that this claim of "retain > copyright" is not all-inclusive.
Well, as ever in these cases, clarification from the copyright holder would be the best way to be sure of the position. But the more I think about it, the more I think "retain copyright" means what it says - i.e., keep something you already have, not obtain something you didn't previously have. This does illustrate yet again one easily-overlooked problem with licence proliferation and "ad hoc" licensing terms for free software - namely, that a lot of these "non-mainstream" terms are very poorly drafted. John (TINLA) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
