On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:33:34AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So Dear legal beagles, please close this loophole, if any.
As outlined previously in the discussion, I don't think there *is* a "loophole" here. Anyone using GPL v.3 software (which includes almost all GNU software issued since GPL v.3 was introduced) to provide remote shell access appears to be bound by GPL v.3 to provide the source, whether they have modified that software or otherwise. At least, that's my take, and no-one has yet put forward a counter-argument on this thread. So there is no loophole, but equally there is probably a very high rate of non-compliance, which is a different matter. John (TINLA) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
