"brian m. carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Please follow up to -legal only.
Done. > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > >Hi, > >I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the > >following statements: > >---------------------- > > 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > > notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > > copyright > > notice, this list of conditions, and the following disclaimer in the > > documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > > 3. > > All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this > > software must display the following acknowledgement: > > This product includes software developed at the University > > of > > Tennessee, Knoxville, Innovative Computing Laboratories. > > 4. The name of the University, the name of the Laboratory, or > > the > > names of its contributors may not be used to endorse or promote > > products derived from this software without specific written > > permission. -------------------- > > > >I've read DFSG and I'm not sure if items 3 and 4 are problematic. Can > >someone help me ? If it's not ok, may it be in contrib ? > > This is a standard BSD-with-advertising-clause No. I see no grant of permissions (e.g. permission to redistribute, modify, etc.), only a list of requirements. Is text missing from the license? Please post the full text of the copyright statement and license terms. -- \ "We used to laugh at Grandpa when he'd head off and go fishing. | `\ But we wouldn't be laughing that evening when he'd come back | _o__) with some whore he picked up in town." —Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
