"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/16 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Since I was not convinced, I was planning to upload clipperz, an AGPLv3 > > licensed password manager and let ftp-masters decide if AGPLv3 is OK for
What is unconvincing? [...] > Francesco Poli enumerates 2 concerns about the license [1], which > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00032.html > remain unchanged: > * There is not a clear definition of what a remote user is. I think there are other unclear aspects of the licence, some of which may give rise to loopholes that we can use, which are largely similar to those in AGPLv2 outlined by Anthony Towns in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00380.html > * There is a use restriction, that may be associated with a significant cost. BTW, I'm currently awaiting a reply from some experts about whether that cost of that use restriction prevents use by some groups entirely, for reasons that are pretty unrelated. The AGPLv3 is vague enough that I'd also avoid the GPLv3 for now. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
