"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:08 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The source-transmission requirement is hardly onerous if it has > > loopholes (like hosting on third-party cost-free VCSes, perhaps), but > > it's not yet clear exactly what those are. > > It's not a loophole, it's the expectation. Section 13 only specifies "a" > server, not the protocol, not that it must be hosted over your net > connection, nor does it say that you must own/rent the server yourself.
If the previously-available modified copy that you are using goes offline, does one then have to post the source? Is there a generally-accepted statement from FSF that a free VCS solution is sufficient, or is this interpretation only valid for PySol? How can an application deny remote access to people without interacting with them at all? > For our project, I intend to offer free hosting of branches of the engine > and games based on the engine (along with any variants thereof) on the *. > pysoy.org server as we reach a point where that's needed. There's of course > no requirement that anyone upload their modifications to this specific > server, it's a convience factor as the primary purpose of our project is to > lower the barrier for entry for copyleft game development. Lowering the barrier for entry could be done more cheaply by using the GPL. Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
