Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault <[email protected]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > Greg Harris <[email protected]> writes: > > [snip] > > > > But that wording is *not* what has been used for ‘python-imaging’. > > Instead, the wording is: > > > > Permission to [foo] for any purpose and without fee is hereby > > granted, > > > I find that wording rather ambiguous, in my mind it could mean any of > the following: > > * You may [foo] for any purpose, without paying a fee > * You may [foo] for any purpose, as long as you do so without fee > > Does anyone else see this ambiguity ?
I can see how someone might find it if they were looking for it. I don't see it when I read the clause normally. The meaning of that clause, to me, is clearly: * You may [foo] for any purpose and without charging a fee -- \ “The illiterate of the future will not be the person who cannot | `\ read. It will be the person who does not know how to learn.” | _o__) —Alvin Toffler | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
