Francesco Poli <[email protected]> writes: > A little comment: these "public domain declarations" are getting > longer and longer, more and more complicated, less and less > practical to adopt. > > I think that just adopting the Expat/MIT license > (http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt) is a much simpler choice and > achieves a very similar result, without most of the complications.
Yes. If anything, the length of verbiage that Creative Commons feels necessary to effectively place a work in the public domain, under the current copyright regime, only supports the idea that it's significantly *more* complicated than working with copyright and using an appropriate license. In that light, I think that anyone contemplating applying CC0 to a work would be far better to use the Expat license terms instead. -- \ “The cost of education is trivial compared to the cost of | `\ ignorance.” —Thomas Jefferson | _o__) | Ben Finney <[email protected]>
pgpBbKjfWgXxi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
