On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 11:02 +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, > Bernhard R. Link <[email protected]> writes > >> - only that they output the same documentation. > > > >I concur the problem is less severe with documentation than with > >programs, as translating to text and reformating is often not that big > >a loss for documentation. But I think in most cases only a .pdf is still to > >hard to change to call it free. > > Would you call a Word document a good enough source? After all, it > requires a proprietary program to process it properly! :-) No, OO.o is free. > imho, the difference between plain text and a plain pdf is minimal. If, > however, the pdf has loads of embedded links etc ... -- Chow Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
