[email protected] wrote: > Julian wrote: > > * Package names contain meego everywhere. According to common > > believe, they are not subject to trademark restrictions (that's > > why we had a firefox compatibility package for > > firefox->iceweasel transition). They are merely an > > implementation detail, that MeeGo set in stone, and we cannot > > change it without breaking compatibility > > As said, as long as you respect the license of the package you are > free to reuse, redistribute, etc, keeping the original name of the > package.
Assuming you mean "copyright license of the package" and not the trademark licensing under discussion, then I think that would be fine. Could http://meego.com/trademark be updated to remove the "includes project packages" wording, please? Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
