MJ Ray writes: > Look, […]
My reply was specifically to this newsgroup, a long-needed “request” to shut up, and explicitly *not* soliciting *your* personal(!) opinion on those licences either. I do not require the “added value”, and this newsgroup is spammed enough by the likes of you two. Besides, linking a bugreport from 2008 when I specifically asked whether anything had changed as result of the recent, i.e. last quarter year, discussion, was absolutely ZERO added value. Francesco Poli <invernomuto <at> paranoici.org> writes: > You asked whether it's still acceptable for Debian main: I answered by > describing what the FTP Masters think Look, as I said above, that was 2008. Not the recent discussion. *And* paultag already answered by question, to which you even REPLIED, so you KNEW your answer would be redundant. > and what I myself think. I absolutely am NOT interested in your personal opinion. Heck, I looked it up: you’re not even a Debian Developer! If you want to make changes and care about licencing, how about being constructive and starting on that path, then working together with ftpmasters on resolving all these issues? (Again, I personally do not think AGPL, and possibly even GPL, are fully DFSG free either, and I’ve got a totally different opinion on firmware, with backing, but when I act as Debian Developer sponsoring a prospective NM’s packages, I act with DD hat on, not by using my own opinions.) > My own opinion was just a side-note. Yes. What annoys people is that you solicit it in EVERY THREAD in this newsgroup. Stop that, period. > I am surprised to see that you are so annoyed by my answer, which > described the official Debian position on the AfferoGPL The one from 2008, and in a redundant message, since paultag already answered my question. *That* is the annoying thing. It really makes you look bad. > I thought I could add some more information. You apparently didn't > appreciate it. Oh, well, that's a pity. Do not trivialise your response. You’re acting on an agenda, one that can clearly be seen by you soliciting, unasked for, your opinion on this-and-that licence in EVERY thread here, disagreeing on principle. (Hey, that’s my job! ☺) Anyway: stop annoying people like that and try to be constructive by changing the official project stance on those problematic licences from within as an option. But first, “shut up”. bye, //mirabilos (with backing from other DDs in this group, by private mail) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20130901t190342-...@post.gmane.org
