Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> writes: hello Paul,
>> --> Which criteria does the license agreement for Freeplane artwork have >> to meet in order for Freeplane to be allowed in main? > > The DFSG - http://www.debian.org/social_contract One more question: Is it really true that all of the Debian Free Software Guidelines apply not only to code but in the same extent to artwork as well? >> --> Which licenses can you recommend? Can we simply modify the existing >> agreement in order to transfer more rights from the copyright holder >> (artist)? Looks like only CC0, CC-attribution and CC-attribution-sharealike are options. > CC* 3.0+ is great for creative works. The GPL also works, to some degree, > as does permissive licenses like MIT/Expat. I'd prefer CC0 myself. > > Also keep in mind licensing != trademark usage. For instance, Debian has > trademark usage, but it's logo is DFSG free, license-wise. > >> --> How about compatibility with Freeplane's (source code-)license >> (GPL-2+)? > > Irrelevant. It's loaded at runtime, just as the GIMP would load a > non-free image. Totally fine. Those images just can't be in main. Good to know. Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
