On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:

> After all, the 3-clause BSD license is way more permissive than the
> LGPL and does not include any restriction not present in the LGPL.
> As a consequence, I would say that offering the LGPL as a second choice
> is totally moot, once you have already offered the 3-clause BSD license
> as a first choice...

What about the situation where someone chooses the LGPL and adds their
changes under the LGPL only?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6EL71QEfq-nhMvaaGkrPRc=T5oLZhSiwFi0Z=NHUK=4...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to