Dear IANALs, I am in a dialog about a license for a logo I once envisioned and then some proper designed helped to design but because naive me didn't disclose upfront the terms of the logo release -- got problematic.
Now at least we agreed that logo could be released under CC BY SA (share-alike) license but I wondered: if I have a software project which is under more permissive license (MIT or BSD-3) and then includes that logo a) in the code b) in the documentation. Does it obligates "share alike" (thus copyleft) licensing of the entire project, i.e. it would not be available for close-source derivatives? or would be ok as long as logo itself, if modified, is exposed in original form (.ai or .svg) Thanks for your views on this P.S. I would appreciate being CCed in replies -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150225155532.gx7...@onerussian.com
