"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_pal...@zoho.com> writes:

> I investigated the possibility of packaging gpuocelot itself, both in
> the hope that gpuocelot's authors would be more likely to agree to
> fix/clarify the license for its own benefit than for beignet's, and
> because "freeing CUDA" actually looked interesting (I had not
> previously been aware of gpuocelot's existence), but it appears that
> this is neither practical nor relevant to the license issue
[…]

Thank you for putting in the effort to get that far. Thank you,
especially, for reporting your findings here.

-- 
 \        “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. |
  `\  Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85r3qi2317....@benfinney.id.au

Reply via email to