On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:05:39 +1100
Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:

> Riley Baird <bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch>
> writes:
> 
> > Okay, I guess that handling problematic cases by consensus works too.
> > We can intuitively state what is and what is not source in practically
> > all cases, even if we can't give a reason for it.
> 
> We should be able to give good reason for it, we certainly should not
> rely on intuition when it comes to the effects of restrictive laws.

I thought that we were having a discussion about what source code
should be for the purposes of the DFSG, not what source code is for the
purposes of the law.

Attachment: pgpp3Z6cXf_pY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to