On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:58:49 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure > freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a > commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license. > > Now I see a reason for people choosing other licenses, like Apache, is > calling it being more permissive. > > Is it correct to assume "permissive" here refers to the idea of taking > the code and easily changing it proprietary? Taking the code, and > mixing it with other proprietary product ? Not necessarily. It could mean that you want to be as compatible with as many open-source licenses as possible.
pgpEZBqpHAJUl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
