On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:33:42 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: > Elmar Stellnberger <estel...@elstel.org> writes: > > > I have various issues about current licenses. Just see at what makes > > this license pretty much different from other established licenses. > > Let us discuss this in detail when the license should be fit for > > approval. > > Please do not compound the already widespread problem of license > proliferation. > > If you actually want recipients of your software to exercise software > freedom, do everyone (including yourself!) a big favour, by choosing an > existing well-understood widely-implemented free software license. > > What's more, this is not the forum for discussing your own invented > license text. This forum is a service to the Debian project primarily, > and that cause is best served by strongly *discouraging* license > proliferation.
I would just like to say that I fully agree with Ben's comment: license proliferation should be avoided in (almost) all cases. What's worse in the present case is that the proposed license is definitely non-free and has countless issues... Hence, I can do nothing but reiterate Ben's recommendation: please adopt an existing well-known and widely-used free software license! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpulUZqU64j7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
