Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2016, 22:43 +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:45:31AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > // 4. If anything other than configuration, indentation or > > > > comments have been > > > > // altered in the code, the modified code must be made > > > > accessible to the > > > > // original author(s). > > > > > > > > This is impossible to comply with for those who do not have > > > Internet > > > access so I think it would fail DFSG item 5; No Discrimination > > > Against > > > Persons or Groups. > > > > ok -- playing devil's advocate (just a phrase, I am not of that > > opinion > > about the upstream ;)) -- nothing there states about connectivity > > (Internet) or media (digitized, printed) how they must be made > > accessible. Could be via mail, bottle in the ocean, ... > > In addition to the reply by Paul, there is also another common way to > explain why this is not DFSG-free: It fails the "The Desert Island > test": > > https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html > > So I guess bottles in the ocean were already considered and do not > count as "making it accesible to the author". > > Thanks. >
Beside that, it also fails the dissident test.. -- tobi
