Re: freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence

[Ian Jackson]

Drew Parsons writes ("Re: freeness and compatibility of CeCILL-C licence"):
> If I'm reading that right, we can link it from BSD and LGPL libraries.
> Currently MUMPS is in Debian used by
...
> code-aster GPL2

This is a problem then.

Is there any possibility of CeCILL being persuaded to add a GPL
compatibility exception ?  The licence already has an upgrade clause
IIRC.

Ian.