IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > (please CC me, as i'm not subscribed to the list) > > On 2017-11-20 22:20, Walter Landry wrote: >>> >>> now i wonder, are these header files licensed under the EULA or under >>> the BSL? >> >> Are the headers sufficient for development, or does it require some >> compiled libraries? If so, it does not matter if the headers are >> free, since the libraries will be required for any development anyway. >> > > good point, with another fun answer: > in order to successfully use the entire thing, indeed a non-free shared > library is required. > the fun part is, that this library is *not* part of the SDK. > the library is part of another piece of non-free software. however, this > other piece (including the library) is not protected by the same EULA, > and it doesn't forbid the distribution (it doesn't explicitely allow it > either; so i might need to check that with upstream as well).
I think you are just going to have to check with upstream. The licensing is inconsistent. Walter Landry