Eriberto Mota writes ("configure.in is missing but..."):
> In #882538, Helmut pointed that outguess[1] has a configure file[2]
> generated by a missing configure.in. He considers that configure, an
> interpreted script (shell), has no source code because the following
> lines:
...
> I still have doubts about if this situation is a DFSG violation and I
> need more opinions.Pabs and Helmut are right. Can't you find a copy of the configure.ac somewhere ? If not, you may be able to reconstruct one. Skimreading the configure script suggests that wouldn't be too hard. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
