On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:04:47PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> The reason is that the one-way compatibility mechanism of CC-by-sa v4.0
> is not exceptionally clear, and, without that compatibility, the
> CC-by-sa v4.0 license itself has a number of controversial clauses
> (non-free, in my own personal opinion).

CC-BY 4.0 (without SA) may be better than CC-BY-SA in that case,
according to the FSF it's compatible and accepted as a free license (for
content which is not a program).

Reply via email to