>>>>> "Andrius" == Andrius Merkys <mer...@debian.org> writes:
Andrius> Hello, [Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed] Andrius> I encountered a package EvoEF2 [1] which is licensed under Andrius> Expat and has the following in its README.md: Andrius> "EvoEF2 is free to academic users." Andrius> To me such limitation seems to contradict the Expat Andrius> license, but I wonder what is the legal opinion about such Andrius> combination. I know that I can always ask the upstream for Andrius> clarification which I did earlier when the restriction was: I mean under xpat, it's certainly free for academic users, and it's also free for everyone else. Unless that statement in the readme is in a section called license or otherwise claims to be a license, I'd treat it as xpat and move on with life. Sometimes the best approach to licensing is to take a defensible position and not to try and find problems.