Hello everybody, we redistribute GPLv2 software and comply with it by providing source packages together with the binary ones. This is why we do not have to give a written offer to provide the source for 3 years. (Please correct me if I am wrong).
For my understanding, can somebody explain me how third parties building and redistributing Docker containers including GPLv2 software comply with the license when they do not give a written offer to provide the sources for 3 years? In my understanding, the GPLv3 solves that problem with its clause 6d, which is why I am asking for the GPLv2 only… Have a nice week-end, Charles -- Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tooting from work, https://fediscience.org/@charles_plessy Tooting from home, https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
