Il 23/12/2025 21:23, Soren Stoutner ha scritto:
On Tuesday, December 23, 2025 12:31:29 PM Mountain Standard Time Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Il 23/12/2025 19:38, Francesco Poli ha scritto:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:47:10 +0100 Fabio Fantoni wrote:



[...]

And would the copyright part I tried to do be correct?
[...]



In addition to what Soren has already commented about trademark laws, I
would like to point out that stating "License: CC0-1.0" for that icon
does not look correct to me.



First of all, the [icon] on SVG repo states "LICENSE: PD License",
which is not exactly CC0-v1.0 ...
The [explanation] of "PD License" (a very misleading tag, by the
way...) on SVG repo says that the author has waived his/her rights
under copyright law to the extend allowed by law, or that the work is
not eligible ("ineligable" looks like a typo, I think the text meant
"eligible") for copyright.



[icon]: <https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/513083/windows-174>
[explanation]: <https://www.svgrepo.com/page/licensing/#PD>



Well, public domain is difficult and varies wildly across
jurisdictions, so beware!
Please also read [section] 7.1.1 "Public domain" of the
Machine-readable debian/copyright file specification (version 1.0):
please explain why that icon should be considered in the public domain.



[section]:
<https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
#license
-short-name>


I hope this helps.
Season's greetings!



Thanks for your replies, I wrote CC0-1.0 because on
https://www.svgrepo.com/page/licensing/#PD I found:


/(As visual work) This license also might be referred as No copyright
or CC0 1.0 Universal PD Dedication on our website./

this can be correct?
Wow!  That is an interesting situation.  I have never gone down this rabbit
hole before.

1.  There is a distinction between the something in the Public Domain and the
CC0 license, particularly in certain jurisdictions around the world.  One of
the distinctions is that, in some parts of the world, you cannot “release”
something into the Public Domain.  Rather, it can only “age” into the Public
Domain after a certain number of years.

2.  The CC0 muddies this water, because on their website they state:

"CC0 1.0 Universal"

"The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the
public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under
copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent
allowed by law.”

https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en

It is true that the CC0 tries to mimic the same results of the Public Domain,
using a license to do so instead of the actual Public Domain.

3.  The svgrepo website specifically states that when icons are listed as “PD
License” on their website, that means CC0.  Note that “PD License” is not the
same as “Public Domain”, particularly because Public Domains works are not
licensed, and “PD License” is expressly a . . . license.

https://www.svgrepo.com/page/licensing/#PD

svgrepo is legally free to define “PD License” however they like.  And they
are clear that when they write it, they mean “CC0 License” (they even link to
the CC0 in their explanation).

So, based mostly on point 3, I think you are correct to list this as the CC0
in debian/copyright.  I would recommend amending your comment in debian/
copyright to say that the upstream website names the license as “PD License”,
but then defines it as being the same as the CC0 license, with a link to
https://www.svgrepo.com/page/licensing/#PD.

This is correct and complete?

Files: icons/symbolic/xsi-applications-wine-symbolic.svg
Copyright: 2024 bypeople
License: CC0-1.0
Comment: Source: https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/513083/windows-174
 The upstream source lists this icon under "PD License" which SVG Repo
 defines as equivalent to CC0-1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
 See: https://www.svgrepo.com/page/licensing/#PD
 .
 This icon depicts a stylized window design resembling the Windows logo.
 Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. The icon is
 used solely for referential purposes to indicate Windows platform
 compatibility, which constitutes nominative fair use of the trademark.
 No endorsement by or affiliation with Microsoft Corporation is implied.

License: CC0-1.0
 SPDX license expression "CC0-1.0": https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
 .
 On Debian systems, the complete text of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication
 can be found in "/usr/share/common-licenses/CC0-1.0".

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to