Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It crapped out near the end, the whole things is quite fragile anyway, > so instead I've been playing today with some totally alternative > approach of having a site like lintian.d.o, but then for potentially > unlimited amount of type of checks, lintian and non-lintian. You can see > results of lintian coming in to /org/qa.debian.org/rebuildtesting/pool > (the 'rebuildtesting' name is legacy, it's wrong, but I didn't come up > with a nice new name yet) on merkel, but there isn't a good web > interface yet (or one at all). For lintian, it's probably for now > easiest to actually reconstruct the lintian.log file from the current > 'pool'.
> Bonus is that it can do unstable & testing both, and across all archs, > instead of just i386. Especially nice and important for checks like the > one that checks for 'built-with-broken-debhelper'. It also makes it much > much easier to run in parallel scripts with a svn checkout of lintian. This sounds great. This is the new approach that lets it work from an archive pulse as well? > I'll announce to -qa later tonight a bit about the status of this, it's > work in progress, but it's long overdue. Let me know if there's anything in particular I can help with. Faster lintian.debian.org results and a way to gather other checks into the same interface both sound fantastic, particularly given all those [external] wont-fix bugs against lintian that often look like good candidates for other tools that work in different ways than lintian does. > Probably a good idea to have some decent registration, perhaps via > usertags and stuff, not sure how to do so exactly... I'm myself not > really going to get involved in that in the near future, but am > definitely interested on the medium term :). Maybe I'll write something up if I get a chance. I have some policy stuff I want to do first, though. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]