tags 889592 + pending

Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:

> Seems a shame to lose a bunch of good catches if we can prune down the
> false-positives.  And even if this ends up missing some true positives,
> it would be a net win to catch the packages that *do* fail to check

Okay, let's give it another go :)  Here we go:


Mattia wrote:

> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/a/avro-c/rules-1.8.2-1
>    Not sure why this is matched, I thought it wouldn't have been:
>    |override_dh_auto_test:
>    |  dh_auto_test --no-parallel

Ah, his is was a bug in my code that was due to scalar/array context ie.
using $rules_per_target{'override_dh_auto_test'} instead of, obviously,
@{$rules_per_target{'override_dh_auto_test'}} … ;)

Enjoy :)


     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Reply via email to