Your message dated Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:53:17 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: lintian: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package false positive for dbgsym packages has caused the Debian Bug report #931993, regarding lintian: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package false positive for dbgsym packages to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 931993: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931993 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: lintian Version: 2.16.0 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, For the saga packaging available in git, lintian reports: E: libsaga-gdi-7.3.0-dbgsym: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package libsaga-gdi-7.3.0 E: libsaga-api-7.3.0-dbgsym: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package libsaga-api-7.3.0 These seem to be false positives, the dbgsym packages are generated from the same source. I think that binary_package_type should not return undef if the binary package is a dbgsym package, e.g. something like: diff --git a/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm b/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm index 718a8f3e8..a3a597237 100644 --- a/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm +++ b/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ sub binary_package_type { $self->{binaries} = \%binaries; return $binaries{$binary} if exists $binaries{$binary}; - return; + return $binary =~ /-dbgym$/ ? 'deb' : undef; } =item source_field([FIELD[, DEFAULT]]) Kind Regards, Bas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---notfound 931993 lintian/2.16.0 thanks On 7/13/19 3:22 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > For the saga packaging available in git, lintian reports: > > E: libsaga-gdi-7.3.0-dbgsym: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package > libsaga-gdi-7.3.0 > E: libsaga-api-7.3.0-dbgsym: usr-share-doc-symlink-to-foreign-package > libsaga-api-7.3.0 > > These seem to be false positives, the dbgsym packages are generated from > the same source. This was actually an issue in the saga package, sorry for the noise. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--- End Message ---
