Hi Brian, On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:38:19AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Holger Levsen <[email protected]> writes: > > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1750-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1730-2 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 719-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 706-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 659-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 607-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 580-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 567-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 377-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 267-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 115-2 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 145-2 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0015-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0014-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0013-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0012-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0011-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0010-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0009-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0008-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0007-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0006-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0005-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0004-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0003-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0002-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 0001-1 > > > > I suspect the first 15 need a bit more manual work, as the mails sent at > > that time didnt contain DLA IDs, the next 10 need investigation (some > > are missing because the ID was never used, we should probably create > > empty/dummy entries for those) and the last two are probably just > > oversights by their authors, who I'll now ping seperatly via IRC. > > Why are some of these 3 digits and others 4 digits? I can't help but > feel that might be an error somewhere.
I'm almost sure this (the 000X-1 ones) is due to that in the beginning when LTS was bootstraped, there were open question on how to name the advisories etc ... For reference see for instance <[email protected]> were it was even not yet clear to use DLA. I'm almost sure that at the very beginning much was experimented to find the correct way forward. Regards, Salvatore
