Hi, On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:55:31PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 02.04.19 um 12:39 schrieb Sylvain Beucler: > > Ideally we could then cron this out as Markus suggested. > > So far I had no problems with the parse script. I just download the html > file from the DLA announcement manually and then I use the script. The > idea to use a <pre> block would certainly simplify the parsing though.
The script can be used directly on the DLA text/mail, btw (it's not based on the list archive, no need to download). Also I remember fixing one of your DLAs before a webwml admin made an angry commit, the script is sometimes silently bogus. On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:57:43AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:55:31PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > First of all, thank you for your improvements on the parse script. I > > share your concerns about the usefulness of translating the security > > advisories. > > just because you/we understand English doesnt mean the whole world does. I'm sure everybody understands the importance of translation, I did quite a lot of i18n myself. Just wondering its usefulness for DLAs. But I figured that translating the DLAs is a matter of priority for the translators, not us, so let's do the i18n on our side, and let the translators prioritize :) > > I agree without the translations we could also consider to > > link to the mail archive. > > and then the mail archive software changes one day, and the links break. > > i agree there is a little overhead currently, but a.) there are benefits > in doing so and b.) we can make the overhead go away. I'll recap the rationale points in the Development wiki page in a few days unless somebody beats me to it. Cheers! Sylvain