Hi,
I have updated and patched squizz to remove licensed file (used for testing)
I have packages: squizz, libsquizz and libsquizz-dev. I kept libraries
in a single package as it does not really make sense to separate them.
I just have an issue with my lintian override I cannot make work (W:
libsquizz: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libbioali0 libbioseq0)
My override is not taken into account. I tried many things but there is
certainly something wrong with it.... If you have an idea on how I
should define it ?
I tried:
libsquizz binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
and
libsquizz binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libbioali0 libbioseq0
I also tried with source...
Thanks
Olivier
Le 3/18/11 8:40 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I am splitting squizz in packages squizz (binary), libsquizz and
libsquizz-dev as you proposed.
I have an "issue" though, the generated libs (libsquizz) by the tool are
libbioseq and libbioali, not some libsquizz-bioseq kind.
This raise a Warn in lintian.
Should I change the "make" files to modify the libs name, or is it
acceptable anyway...
Yes, I know about this warning. That's why I shortly mentioned that you
might consider two library and two dev packages. However, I would only
do this split is it makes sense from the *content* of the library, i.e.
if each single library would make sense in its own. Otherwise you might
consider overriding the lintian warning and add a comment inside the
override file, why splitting makes no sense.
I could also create (sub)binary packages with package name libbioseq and
libbioali, but I don't think it is acceptable to use several packages
names (not like squizz-xxx). My control file would have source package
squizz and binary packages squizz, libbioali, libbioseq
That's no question of name but rather a question of content. There are
control files (try "apt-get source blast2" for example) which even
create different version numbers for some of the binary packages. So
there is no need to bother about different naming.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
