Hi Amul, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:41:36AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > > > >Does this clarify my idea why fixing the licensing issue in > >fis-gtm-6.2-000 would be sufficient? > > [amul:11] We have two options at this point regarding > fis-gtm-6.1-000. Withdraw the version or update it. We - I, Bhaskar > and a few other GT.M developers - are fine with either. If someone > could point me to a doc to show how to fix the prior version, I can > fix it. My google-fu isn't turning anything up.
The fix would be to just take apply your latest patch to d/copyright and apply it to the packaging of fis-gtm-6.1-000. However, as I explained I consider this a waste of time since it becomes fixed with the upload of fis-gtm-6.2-000 anyway (which I plan in the next couple of hours). > [amul:11] I looked through > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference for the > steps to withdraw the package > (https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#removing-pkgs) > and close the bug > (https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-bugfix). > Is that what I should do? Simply waiting at your side seems to be sufficient. I just did not found a spare cycle to build and upload the current state of Git. Thanks for all your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
