Hi Andreas, On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:54 PM Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrei, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:08:37PM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote: > > Copyright updated. > > Yeah.. I am quite paranoid about copyright :) Thanks for fixing it . > I'm sorry I seem to have dragged you into some extra work (like as a > school punishment). It was not intended that you split up all those > files into single copyright years. I summarised those two blocks of > files that were copyrighted by different copyright holders and simply > used the beginning and ending years for all. That should be sufficient > to give them according credit. So my self-imposed punishment was to > fix those edits. ;-) > The real missing was the license field that really belongs to every > Files paragraph. This is added as well. So this should be OK now. > Ok. I will check the commits. Thanks! > I also worked a bit on debian/control - please check my two commits. > One is fixing that the short description should be no sentence. > The other one fixes the lintian warning about a too long line in > the description. I simply fixed it by using > > cme fix dpkg-control > > Ok. > Please confirm that you have cme installed and can run this program > sucessfully. Its your friend when doing automatic changes to d/control. > > Please also confirm that you can run lintian - I strongly recommend to > install lintian from unstable no matter what system you are running - be > it stable, testing or even some Debian derivative. Since we are > developing for unstable we should use the latest policy checker. To > ensure this I have droped the following file on my system: > > $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/01-lintian.pref > Package: lintian > Pin: release a=unstable > Pin-Priority: 601 > > Package: lintian-brush > Pin: release a=unstable > Pin-Priority: 601 > > Ok. I will check. > > Lintian-brush is another nice package which I regularly use. It just > fixes lintian issues and commits these to your Git repository. > > So lintian tells you about the resulting package: > > I: ampl-netlib-solvers: unstripped-static-library > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a(asldate.o) > I: ampl-netlib-solvers: unstripped-static-library > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a(atof.o) > I: ampl-netlib-solvers: unstripped-static-library > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a(auxinfo.o) > I: ampl-netlib-solvers: unstripped-static-library ... use > --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program) > > > (when running with --info severity which I ensure by droping the following > file: > > $ cat ~/.config/lintian/lintianrc > color=always > display-experimental=no > display-info=yes > > ) > > I will look into it. Thanks for all comments, directions and help. > I have not seen this info before but considering the size of > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/amplsolver.a I suspect all needed libraries > are statically linked which is what we do not want. So your task > is to find a quilt patch for the makefile to prevent static linking > and do dynamic linking instead. For sure you can keep on asking here > how to do this. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > Best AndreiR
