Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:41, Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 17.10.21 21:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Hi Steffen, > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> >> On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> >> Yeah, snakemake has now moved to pulp 2.0. pulp had another rev-dep on >> congress which is now removed from archive. >> pulp is maintained in openstack, and I sent out an email to zigo and >> openstack-list asking to upgrade, >> >> cf: https://lists.debian.org/debian-openstack/2021/10/msg00001.html >> >> I had been there and already got a reply from zigo (June this year) that >> we can go ahead with an update since pulp is (no longer?) used with Open >> Stack. I never got around to it, though. I Just paste our exchange below >> (don't expect anyone to mind). >> > Wonderful, thanks for pasting this! > Are you at it? -- If you could do the needful and upload .... :) > > Sorry for disappointing you but I am afraid I need to concentrate on > something else this week. > No worries, I have done so, and pushed my changes to: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-pulp I really, _really_ need reviews. The very odd thing here is same content in postrm and prerm, and no update-alternatives for installing in postinst -- I admit, I do not understand pulp very well, hence would want reviews. Could you/someone else please, please take a look and upload? And oh, BTW I added you in the uploaders field since you planned to takeover this. Thanks!!! Nilesh
