Hi Nilesh,
On 17.10.21 23:27, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:41, Steffen Möller <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 17.10.21 21:39, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Yeah, snakemake has now moved to pulp 2.0. pulp had another
rev-dep on congress which is now removed from archive.
pulp is maintained in openstack, and I sent out an email to
zigo and openstack-list asking to upgrade,
cf:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-openstack/2021/10/msg00001.html
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-openstack/2021/10/msg00001.html>
I had been there and already got a reply from zigo (June this
year) that we can go ahead with an update since pulp is (no
longer?) used with Open Stack. I never got around to it,
though. I Just paste our exchange below (don't expect anyone
to mind).
Wonderful, thanks for pasting this!
Are you at it? -- If you could do the needful and upload .... :)
Sorry for disappointing you but I am afraid I need to concentrate
on something else this week.
No worries, I have done so, and pushed my changes to:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-pulp
<https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-pulp>
I really, _really_ need reviews. The very odd thing here is same
content in postrm and prerm, and no update-alternatives for installing
in postinst -- I admit, I do not understand pulp very well,
hence would want reviews.
Could you/someone else please, please take a look and upload?
And oh, BTW I added you in the uploaders field since you planned to
takeover this.
Uploaded.
lintian -i preferred the removal in prerm. So, it is a bit redundant
now. I thought this was fine, though. Is anyone continuing the update of
snakemake now?
Best,
Steffen
