Hi Yavor,
at first thanks a lot for all your effort. This is really appreciated.
Am Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 01:20:38PM +0200 schrieb Yavor Doganov:
> I prepared an upload which fixes the two RC bugs reported (#1097784
> and #1113466) and would like an available DD to review my changes and
> eventually upload.
>
> There are a few problems:
>
> * The Salsa CI jobs fail; it was pointed to me on IRC that this is
> due to a wrong project variable SALSA_CI_EXTRA_REPOSITORY set [1]
> (I don't have access to this URL). Would appreciate if someone
> with proper rights can fix it and restart the jobs.
This URL does not exist. However, I made you Owner of this repository
so you can set whatever might be needed.
> * It seems that README.source hasn't been followed since quite some
> time -- there were two patches but no patch-queue/debian/master
> branch. So I committed my patches to the debian/master branch.
ACK
> * I downloaded the upstream tarball with uscan using the old watch
> file. But when I upgraded it to version 5, the checksum of the
> tarball it fetches is different.
I admit I do not understand this.
> * There is new Python-based functionality which is not working. The
> tomography_python_programs Python module from src:relion cannot be
> packaged due to missing (in Debian) dependencies. There are also
> extra Python modules available in separate upstream repositories
> which must be packaged as well (relion-classranker, relion-blush,
> DynaMight, topaz, model-angelo).
I've added Roland to CC who might comment on this.
> * I tried configuring with -DBUILD_TESTS=ON and -DRELION_TEST=1 to
> get some build-time testing but there are compiler errors.
> Apparently upstream hasn't tested them in a while...
I would recommend to write some upstream issue about this.
Thanks again for your work
Andreas.
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/relion/-/settings/ci_cd#js-cicd-variables-settings
--
https://fam-tille.de