On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:19 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > Aleš Koval (author of fpm2) wrote: > > FPM2 data file is 100% compatible with his old version. I port FPM2 as > > drop-in replacement old FPM in mind.
In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why not just do a new fpm package (version 2.x.y) and avoid all the transitioning? To me, an fpm2 package makes sense only if you intend to support both versions in the archive at the same time. Richard P.S. IANADD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
