-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Laager wrote: > In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why > not just do a new fpm package (version 2.x.y) and avoid all the > transitioning? To me, an fpm2 package makes sense only if you intend to > support both versions in the archive at the same time.
FPM2 is a forked project from fpm. I think we should respect the upstream name, both for FPM2 and fpm. I do not think upstream author will be happy about the renaming. We can drop the transitional package in Lenny+1. Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIJP/XdEpXpumNYVkRAhuCAKCC0zuq5WINKIRkuZxHKnDnuM4wsgCfd5Jr tq8bB1glmZdv0ox8bvHUTkk= =HIPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
