Am 15.04.2011 02:10, schrieb Paul Wise:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He
also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet.
I thought I said that libpkg-guide was wrong about library dev package names.
My comment about nothing using it was unrelated to that though.
Here's what you said:
(08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you
read libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries
(08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend libfoo1-dev instead of
libfoo-dev, which is against best practices
(08:07:36) pabs: BigMc: nothing in Debian depends on alure yet, so you
won't need to worry about any transition issues
libpkg-guide says both names are ok for Alure, but of course I believe
you when you say it's against best practices.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
