On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's what you said: > > (08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read > libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries > (08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend libfoo1-dev instead of > libfoo-dev, which is against best practices > (08:07:36) pabs: BigMc: nothing in Debian depends on alure yet, so you won't > need to worry about any transition issues > > libpkg-guide says both names are ok for Alure, but of course I believe you > when you say it's against best practices. I guess I could have been more clear :) To be clear, libalure-dev is the right name for most cases, you almost never need a name like libalure1-dev. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
